What the free comparison shows
Paste a friend’s version-two Wildprint code after completing your own quiz. The comparison identifies overall signal overlap, the dimension where you are closest, and the dimension with the largest gap. The calculation stays in your browser.
A large gap is not automatically a problem. Direct and gentle communicators, for example, can complement each other when they agree on how decisions will be voiced. The risk appears when each treats their preferred style as evidence of the other person’s intent.
A better way to read compatibility
Start with the shared signal because it is usually the easiest place to build trust. Then name the largest contrast in neutral language: faster versus slower deliberation, steadier versus more flexible adaptation, or more open versus firmer boundaries.
The most useful outcome is an operating agreement. Decide how much notice a change needs, how disagreement should be expressed, what requires private processing, and when a boundary needs an explicit yes.
What the result cannot decide
A creature pair cannot measure care, honesty, safety, values, power, or the history between two people. It should never overrule observed behavior. If a relationship is unsafe or coercive, a playful compatibility metaphor is not an appropriate decision tool.
Use Wildprint to make a conversation more specific, not to outsource the conversation.
COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently asked questions
Do I need my friend’s answers?
No. They share a compact Wildprint code that contains their result signals, not their individual answers or identity.
Does a low overlap mean we are incompatible?
No. Overlap describes similarity, not relationship quality. A contrast can create friction, complementarity, or both depending on communication and context.
Can I compare the same animal type?
Yes. Two people with the same primary creature can still have different signal values and shadow creatures.